![]() ![]() Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College Computer-Based Testing and Validity: A Look Back and into the Future. (1996) Equivalency of computer-assisted and paper-and-pencil administered version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 331-345. Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Research in Personality, 40-4, 339-376.īutcher, J., Perry, J., & Hahn, J. Personality Assessment: Does the Medium Matter? No. Please refer to the following studies regarding the appropriateness of administering forced-choice assessments via computer or other electronic means.Ĭhuah et al (2006). No significant technological problems were noted during administration, and the results are considered to be a valid estimate of the examinee's skills/abilities." For example, "The remote testing environment appeared free of distractions, adequate rapport was established with the examinee via video and s/he appeared appropriately engaged in the task throughout the session. ![]() Report your clinical decision(s) in your report and comment on the factors that led to this decision and your reporting or lack of reporting of the scores. Make a clinical judgment, similar to a face-to-face session, whether or not you are able to gather the examinee's best performance.For example, " The 16PF was administered by remote on-screen administration through the Q-global system, and the examiner's assistant monitored the administration using a live video connection." Always state in your report that the test was administered via telepractice, and briefly describe the method of telepractice used. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |